MGMT8110 – Global Perspectives
Instructor:
Email:
Hajar Alviri
Winter Semester
Research Essay
Worth 25% of final grade for this course.
Due Date:
Delivery Method:
Week 9, 11:59PM
Word Doc uploaded to eConestoga
Assignments Folder / “Research Project – Research Essay”
Late Submissions:
➢ A late submission will receive a grade of Zero (0) unless arrangements
have been made with the Instructor prior to the deadline.
Essay Requirements:
The Essay is the bringing together the research done, the arguments developed, and
conclusions drawn in support of the Research Statement, originally developed (or changed as
project progressed). It is a business communication tool designed to sell your ideas and
recommendations to your superiors.
Based on your approved proposal, write and submit an essay which has the following
elements:
1) Arguments which support and defend the Research Statement. These arguments need
to:
i. Be well organized and flow from a logical start to a strong conclusion. They also
need to demonstrate the significance and important in a global business
perspective.
ii. Clearly supports, defends or justifies the research statement as present.
iii. Be objective – demonstrating that you have thought about this issue from several
points of view.
iv. Be analytical and show your abilities to develop clearly superior ideas and an
originality of thinking.
v. Include solid evidence which demonstrates a breadth, depth and synergy of
research and thinking about this topic.
Updated by:
Hajar Alviri
MGMT8110 – Global Perspectives
Page 1 of 4
Version Date: May 18, 2020
Global Perspectives
Essay Instructions
2) Have good quality writing
i.
Grammar, punctuation, spelling is virtually flawless.
ii.
Language and word choice are appropriate throughout.
3) Use the APA Standard formatting
i. Be well formatted and pleasant to read
ii. Essay follows scholarly conventions including proper citation methods and is
virtually flawlessly.
4) Be original
i. Your paper can use quotes from your research but cannot comprise more than
30% of your paper.
✓ Make sure you take advantage of the “Originality Check” available during weeks
10 and 11 on eConestoga.
5) No less than 1000 words and no more than 1400 words.
i. The count excludes title page, reference, and appendices.
6) Include a cover page which has:
i. Name and Student Number,
ii. Course Number and Name,
iii. “Semester – 2020 Winter”,
iv. Instructor’s Name
v. Date Submitted
7) Create a story with a thread.
i. Starting from the research statement, create a thread of logic building from your
research, developing through the analysis until culminating in the conclusions.
AND at all time supporting the research.
ii. A good story needs an introduction, body and conclusion
✓ Introduction – introduce and provide background on the topic and state your
research statement
✓ Body – shows the analysis, builds arguments that supports the research
statement.
✓ Conclusion – Brings together all of the analysis and arguments into a strong
conclusion that leads to recommendations for global businesses and supports
the research.
i. Shows how conclusions supported by evidence, analysis and
arguments presented in paper.
Updated by:
Hajar Alviri
MGMT8110 – Global Perspectives
Page 2 of 4
Version Date: May 18, 2020
The Marking Rubric: Your Essay will be evaluated using the following rubric:
Essay Arguments (50%)
Excellent 9-10 pts
Good 7-8 pts
Average 5-6 pts
Poor 1-4 pts
Organization
Thoughts, arguments, writing and
presented in a logical order.
Essay proceeds logically
from start to finish and is
coherent throughout.
Research, whether implicit
or explicit, is absolutely
clear and highly original. Is
also
Essay demonstrates a
masterful grasp of all sides
of the issue.
Significant logical
inconsistencies in parts of
the paper make the overall
credibility of the argument
somewhat dubious.
Research is identifiable in
some form, with effort.
The Essay is illogical,
incoherent, and as a result
completely unconvincing.
Research Quality
The strength, clarity and originality of
research.
Essay includes some logical
inconsistencies, but they
hardly detract from the
overall coherence of the
argument
Research, whether implicit
or explicit, is clear and
deliberate.
Essay effectively recognizes
a variety of points of view.
Essay is clearly, albeit
unintentionally, partial. It
either fails to deal with
contrary points of view out
of ignorance or deals with
them unfairly.
Analytical abilities on
display are inconsistent.
Some ideas are clear and
fully understood; others are
not.
Essay is deliberately not
impartial. The author has
used the paper as a pulpit
instead of as a framework
for rigorous critical analysis.
Objectivity
Writing, arguments, facts and
conclusions consider several
perspectives and can be verified
through evidence and facts.
Analysis
The examination of the elements or
structure of the issue to draw
conclusions.
Updated by:
Hajar Alviri
Analytical abilities on
display are clearly superior
and reflect an originality of
thinking
Analytical abilities on
display demonstrate an
ability to separate ideas
into their component parts
MGMT8110 – Global Perspectives
Essay does not contain –
either implicitly or explicitly
– a research.
Paper reproduces
arguments from other
sources without any
evidence of understanding
Page 3 of 4
Version Date: May, 18, 2020
Global Perspectives
Evidence supporting arguments and
research statement (35%)
Depth
Analysis and writing go beyond
the basic, surface issue and
explores the many elements and
interrelationship between
elements of the issue.
Breadth
The number of sources, ideas,
perspectives, ideas are brought
into the analysis, thinking and
writing. Here, more is better
Synthesis
The way the ideas, elements,
thoughts, analysis are brought
together to create a solid
understanding, supporting a
conclusion and
recommendation.
Relevance
Evidence which supports the
ideas, elements, thoughts,
analysis and are related to the
conclusion and
recommendations.
Quality of Writing (10%)
Quality of Format (5%)
Updated by:
Hajar Alviri
Essay Instructions
Excellent 9-10 pts
Good 7-8 pts
Average 5-6 pts
Poor 1-4 pts
Essay draws from sources
that represent the best
information on the subject.
Quantity exceeds
expectations.
Essay draws from a legitimate
variety of information. Quantity
of sources meets or exceeds
expectations.
While the Essay might draw
from a number of sources,
but the information
obtained is largely surface
level.
Essay is drawn largely, if
not exclusively, from
inappropriate material.
Essay draws from an
impressive variety of sources
and perspectives.
Essay draws from an acceptable
variety of sources and
perspectives.
Sources either come from a
single perspective or are
insufficient to meet the
demands of the assignment.
Presentation of the evidence
demonstrates a masterful
understanding of its themes,
both specific and general.
Presentation of the evidence
demonstrates a clear
understanding of its themes,
both specific and general.
Presentation of the evidence
demonstrates a flawed
understanding of either its
specific or general themes.
Sources are both
excessively limited in
quantity and represent an
excessively limited point of
view.
Presentation of the
evidence demonstrates a
flawed understanding of
both its specific and
general themes.
Evidence is directly
applicable to the analysis
throughout
Evidence is largely applicable to
the analysis throughout.
Some of the evidence is
clearly tangential and
detracts from the credibility
of the argument.
Evidence does not
contribute to a fulfillment
of the goals of the
assignment.
Grammar, punctuation,
spelling are virtually
flawless. Language and word
choice are appropriate
throughout.
Limited flaws in grammar,
punctuation, and/or spelling do
not detract from the overall
message of the Essay. Some
minor problems with language
and word choice are noted but
not problematic.
Only minor flaws in terms of
scholarly conventions including
citation methods.
Significant flaws in some of
grammar, punctuation,
spelling, language and/or
word choice.
Paper is incoherent
because of flaws in
grammar, punctuation,
spelling, language, and/or
word choice.
Significant flaws in terms of
scholarly conventions (likely
including problems with
citation methods).
Paper displays a blatant
disregard for scholarly
conventions.
Essay follows scholarly
conventions including
proper citation methods
virtually flawlessly.
MGMT8110 – Global Perspectives
Page 4 of 4
Version Date: May 18, 2020
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Instructor:
Email:
Hajar Alviri
Winter Semester
Research Essay
Worth 25% of final grade for this course.
Due Date:
Delivery Method:
Week 9, 11:59PM
Word Doc uploaded to eConestoga
Assignments Folder / “Research Project – Research Essay”
Late Submissions:
➢ A late submission will receive a grade of Zero (0) unless arrangements
have been made with the Instructor prior to the deadline.
Essay Requirements:
The Essay is the bringing together the research done, the arguments developed, and
conclusions drawn in support of the Research Statement, originally developed (or changed as
project progressed). It is a business communication tool designed to sell your ideas and
recommendations to your superiors.
Based on your approved proposal, write and submit an essay which has the following
elements:
1) Arguments which support and defend the Research Statement. These arguments need
to:
i. Be well organized and flow from a logical start to a strong conclusion. They also
need to demonstrate the significance and important in a global business
perspective.
ii. Clearly supports, defends or justifies the research statement as present.
iii. Be objective – demonstrating that you have thought about this issue from several
points of view.
iv. Be analytical and show your abilities to develop clearly superior ideas and an
originality of thinking.
v. Include solid evidence which demonstrates a breadth, depth and synergy of
research and thinking about this topic.
Updated by:
Hajar Alviri
MGMT8110 – Global Perspectives
Page 1 of 4
Version Date: May 18, 2020
Global Perspectives
Essay Instructions
2) Have good quality writing
i.
Grammar, punctuation, spelling is virtually flawless.
ii.
Language and word choice are appropriate throughout.
3) Use the APA Standard formatting
i. Be well formatted and pleasant to read
ii. Essay follows scholarly conventions including proper citation methods and is
virtually flawlessly.
4) Be original
i. Your paper can use quotes from your research but cannot comprise more than
30% of your paper.
✓ Make sure you take advantage of the “Originality Check” available during weeks
10 and 11 on eConestoga.
5) No less than 1000 words and no more than 1400 words.
i. The count excludes title page, reference, and appendices.
6) Include a cover page which has:
i. Name and Student Number,
ii. Course Number and Name,
iii. “Semester – 2020 Winter”,
iv. Instructor’s Name
v. Date Submitted
7) Create a story with a thread.
i. Starting from the research statement, create a thread of logic building from your
research, developing through the analysis until culminating in the conclusions.
AND at all time supporting the research.
ii. A good story needs an introduction, body and conclusion
✓ Introduction – introduce and provide background on the topic and state your
research statement
✓ Body – shows the analysis, builds arguments that supports the research
statement.
✓ Conclusion – Brings together all of the analysis and arguments into a strong
conclusion that leads to recommendations for global businesses and supports
the research.
i. Shows how conclusions supported by evidence, analysis and
arguments presented in paper.
Updated by:
Hajar Alviri
MGMT8110 – Global Perspectives
Page 2 of 4
Version Date: May 18, 2020
The Marking Rubric: Your Essay will be evaluated using the following rubric:
Essay Arguments (50%)
Excellent 9-10 pts
Good 7-8 pts
Average 5-6 pts
Poor 1-4 pts
Organization
Thoughts, arguments, writing and
presented in a logical order.
Essay proceeds logically
from start to finish and is
coherent throughout.
Research, whether implicit
or explicit, is absolutely
clear and highly original. Is
also
Essay demonstrates a
masterful grasp of all sides
of the issue.
Significant logical
inconsistencies in parts of
the paper make the overall
credibility of the argument
somewhat dubious.
Research is identifiable in
some form, with effort.
The Essay is illogical,
incoherent, and as a result
completely unconvincing.
Research Quality
The strength, clarity and originality of
research.
Essay includes some logical
inconsistencies, but they
hardly detract from the
overall coherence of the
argument
Research, whether implicit
or explicit, is clear and
deliberate.
Essay effectively recognizes
a variety of points of view.
Essay is clearly, albeit
unintentionally, partial. It
either fails to deal with
contrary points of view out
of ignorance or deals with
them unfairly.
Analytical abilities on
display are inconsistent.
Some ideas are clear and
fully understood; others are
not.
Essay is deliberately not
impartial. The author has
used the paper as a pulpit
instead of as a framework
for rigorous critical analysis.
Objectivity
Writing, arguments, facts and
conclusions consider several
perspectives and can be verified
through evidence and facts.
Analysis
The examination of the elements or
structure of the issue to draw
conclusions.
Updated by:
Hajar Alviri
Analytical abilities on
display are clearly superior
and reflect an originality of
thinking
Analytical abilities on
display demonstrate an
ability to separate ideas
into their component parts
MGMT8110 – Global Perspectives
Essay does not contain –
either implicitly or explicitly
– a research.
Paper reproduces
arguments from other
sources without any
evidence of understanding
Page 3 of 4
Version Date: May, 18, 2020
Global Perspectives
Evidence supporting arguments and
research statement (35%)
Depth
Analysis and writing go beyond
the basic, surface issue and
explores the many elements and
interrelationship between
elements of the issue.
Breadth
The number of sources, ideas,
perspectives, ideas are brought
into the analysis, thinking and
writing. Here, more is better
Synthesis
The way the ideas, elements,
thoughts, analysis are brought
together to create a solid
understanding, supporting a
conclusion and
recommendation.
Relevance
Evidence which supports the
ideas, elements, thoughts,
analysis and are related to the
conclusion and
recommendations.
Quality of Writing (10%)
Quality of Format (5%)
Updated by:
Hajar Alviri
Essay Instructions
Excellent 9-10 pts
Good 7-8 pts
Average 5-6 pts
Poor 1-4 pts
Essay draws from sources
that represent the best
information on the subject.
Quantity exceeds
expectations.
Essay draws from a legitimate
variety of information. Quantity
of sources meets or exceeds
expectations.
While the Essay might draw
from a number of sources,
but the information
obtained is largely surface
level.
Essay is drawn largely, if
not exclusively, from
inappropriate material.
Essay draws from an
impressive variety of sources
and perspectives.
Essay draws from an acceptable
variety of sources and
perspectives.
Sources either come from a
single perspective or are
insufficient to meet the
demands of the assignment.
Presentation of the evidence
demonstrates a masterful
understanding of its themes,
both specific and general.
Presentation of the evidence
demonstrates a clear
understanding of its themes,
both specific and general.
Presentation of the evidence
demonstrates a flawed
understanding of either its
specific or general themes.
Sources are both
excessively limited in
quantity and represent an
excessively limited point of
view.
Presentation of the
evidence demonstrates a
flawed understanding of
both its specific and
general themes.
Evidence is directly
applicable to the analysis
throughout
Evidence is largely applicable to
the analysis throughout.
Some of the evidence is
clearly tangential and
detracts from the credibility
of the argument.
Evidence does not
contribute to a fulfillment
of the goals of the
assignment.
Grammar, punctuation,
spelling are virtually
flawless. Language and word
choice are appropriate
throughout.
Limited flaws in grammar,
punctuation, and/or spelling do
not detract from the overall
message of the Essay. Some
minor problems with language
and word choice are noted but
not problematic.
Only minor flaws in terms of
scholarly conventions including
citation methods.
Significant flaws in some of
grammar, punctuation,
spelling, language and/or
word choice.
Paper is incoherent
because of flaws in
grammar, punctuation,
spelling, language, and/or
word choice.
Significant flaws in terms of
scholarly conventions (likely
including problems with
citation methods).
Paper displays a blatant
disregard for scholarly
conventions.
Essay follows scholarly
conventions including
proper citation methods
virtually flawlessly.
MGMT8110 – Global Perspectives
Page 4 of 4
Version Date: May 18, 2020
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Leave a comment